On 22-07-2016 13:26:13, Wout Mertens wrote: > Ok, how about this: We split nixpkgs in nixpkgs-core and nixpkgs-community
I would argue against this. As others have explained (and as Graham Christensen wrote in the next mail in this thread) size is not a bad thing and we really should be proud. Reaching out to others and asking how they do it is way better IMO. Splitting the problem into smaller ones will not solve the issue. Also: "Moving" packages between repositories is not as trivial as you might think. We would lose history _all the time_, and at least I consider this a big NO-NO. -- Mit freundlichen Grüßen, Kind regards, Matthias Beyer Proudly sent with mutt. Happily signed with gnupg.
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ nix-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
