On Tue, Aug 30, 2016 at 8:02 AM, Shea Levy <[email protected]> wrote: > globin missed the fact that the naming convention is messing up the > lowPrio logic, and your original PR had nothing to do with that. If rust > were named properly, your fix would be wrong.
What is the exact naming scheme that rust should adopt? I will make a pull request to fix this. > Even in this case where > your fix is harmless (which globin reasonably missed), it doesn't > actually fix your issue and in the event that the rust naming is fixed > it would be harmful then. Secondly, I want to test this harmful aspect. What is the expected harmful behaviour if I follow the steps to reproduce i.e.: correctly name each rust and remove lowprio? _______________________________________________ nix-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
