Hi Roger,
The date is at the top of the page ("This evaluation was performed on
2016-08-29 12:11:27")~Shea Roger Qiu <[email protected]> writes: > It would be useful if those revision hashes were paired with a date. > > > On 30/08/2016 7:34 PM, Shea Levy wrote: >> Hi Stewart, >> >> If you go to >> http://hydra.nixos.org/job/nixos/release-16.03/nixpkgs.rustUnstable.rustc.x86_64-linux/latest/eval#tabs-inputs, >> you can see the nixpkgs revision of the latest successful build of >> rustUnstable. If you ensure that your nixpkgs is not later then that, >> you should always get binaries. If you don't, please report back with >> your nixpkgs.config. >> >> ~Shea >> >> stewart mackenzie <[email protected]> writes: >> >>> I just want this issue resolved. >>> >>> Every time I update / upgrade I recompile rustBeta then rustUnstable >>> and it results in 1/2 day lost. This has happened frequently, recently >>> as rustUnstable and rustBeta have been broken for a long time. >>> (ie days have been lost finding working revs then compiling rust) >>> >>> If the lowprio removal doesn't solve this then how can I get it such >>> that when I issue a `nixos-rebuild --upgrade switch` and my >>> configuration.nix contains `rustUnstable.rustc` downloads these >>> binaries >>> http://hydra.nixos.org/job/nixos/release-16.03/nixpkgs.rustUnstable.rustc.x86_64-linux. >>> >>> What exactly does lowprio do? >>> >>> >>> _______________________________________________ >>> nix-dev mailing list >>> [email protected] >>> http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev > > -- > Founder of Matrix AI > https://matrix.ai/ > +61420925975 > > _______________________________________________ > nix-dev mailing list > [email protected] > http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ nix-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
