Hi Shea,
I like this idea, except for the part where you forcefully remove
maintainers.
I have always seen maintainers as knowledgeable on the package, not
bound to reply on issues about it.
Just ensure that X is big enough :-).
I really like this idea if we limit (3.) to release-small packages or
some subset of core packages.
-- Layus.
On 02/09/16 22:22, Shea Levy wrote:
Hi all,
I think a few changes might improve package stability a bit:
1. Add a nixpkgs config setting to throw an error on packages with no
meta.maintainers
2. Work to reach a point where a significant subset of nixpkgs (say,
release-small) is allowed on this list.
3. Remove maintainers after X weeks without reply on issues they're
tagged in about packages they maintain
4. (Optional) Separate out maintainers by system
Thoughts on these?
~Shea
_______________________________________________
nix-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
_______________________________________________
nix-dev mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
