Why can't people use the commit logs to see who is knowledgeable? I believe we should have some way to denote "this person has committed to make reasonable efforts to keep this package working properly", and the maintainers field seems the right fit.
But anyway, limiting 3 to release-small or whatever important subset we choose is a good change even if we don't go all the way. ~Shea Layus <layus...@gmail.com> writes: > Hi Shea, > > I like this idea, except for the part where you forcefully remove > maintainers. > I have always seen maintainers as knowledgeable on the package, not > bound to reply on issues about it. > Just ensure that X is big enough :-). > > I really like this idea if we limit (3.) to release-small packages or > some subset of core packages. > > -- Layus. > > On 02/09/16 22:22, Shea Levy wrote: >> Hi all, >> >> I think a few changes might improve package stability a bit: >> >> 1. Add a nixpkgs config setting to throw an error on packages with no >> meta.maintainers >> 2. Work to reach a point where a significant subset of nixpkgs (say, >> release-small) is allowed on this list. >> 3. Remove maintainers after X weeks without reply on issues they're >> tagged in about packages they maintain >> 4. (Optional) Separate out maintainers by system >> >> Thoughts on these? >> >> ~Shea >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> nix-dev mailing list >> nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl >> http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ nix-dev mailing list nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
