See [1], though I should have wrapped the callPackage call in lowPrio (See e.g. [2] for an example of using lowPrio).
[1]: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/commit/01f571148583bcc85fad1963536a788d828befbf [2]: https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/01f571148583bcc85fad1963536a788d828befbf/pkgs/top-level/all-packages.nix#L1615 Wink Saville <w...@saville.com> writes: > If you can point to me an example I'll prepare a pull request. > > On Thu, Sep 29, 2016, 5:43 AM Shea Levy <s...@shealevy.com> wrote: > >> We could bring vim 8 to 16.09, as long as it had a separate attribute >> and were set lo-prio so only people who explicitly asked for it would >> get it. >> >> Domen Kožar <do...@dev.si> writes: >> >> > After the branch off (beta release) we only port minor updates and >> security >> > upgrades. It's a day until the release so we can't do a major vim upgrade >> > since we risk there are issues and it's an important part of the >> ecosystem. >> > >> > On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 5:33 AM, Wink Saville <w...@saville.com> wrote: >> > >> >> What is the criteria for inclusion in 16.09, any possibility we could >> >> include 16.09? >> >> >> >> -- Wink >> >> >> >> _______________________________________________ >> >> nix-dev mailing list >> >> nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl >> >> http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev >> >> >> >> >> > _______________________________________________ >> > nix-dev mailing list >> > nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl >> > http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev >>
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ nix-dev mailing list nix-dev@lists.science.uu.nl http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
