Thanks for the link and I think I understand, but it's beyond my current experience to do it quickly and correctly. So for now it's probably best to leave well enough alone :)
On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 8:34 AM Shea Levy <[email protected]> wrote: > See [1], though I should have wrapped the callPackage call in lowPrio > (See e.g. [2] for an example of using lowPrio). > > [1]: > https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/commit/01f571148583bcc85fad1963536a788d828befbf > [2]: > https://github.com/NixOS/nixpkgs/blob/01f571148583bcc85fad1963536a788d828befbf/pkgs/top-level/all-packages.nix#L1615 > > Wink Saville <[email protected]> writes: > > > If you can point to me an example I'll prepare a pull request. > > > > On Thu, Sep 29, 2016, 5:43 AM Shea Levy <[email protected]> wrote: > > > >> We could bring vim 8 to 16.09, as long as it had a separate attribute > >> and were set lo-prio so only people who explicitly asked for it would > >> get it. > >> > >> Domen Kožar <[email protected]> writes: > >> > >> > After the branch off (beta release) we only port minor updates and > >> security > >> > upgrades. It's a day until the release so we can't do a major vim > upgrade > >> > since we risk there are issues and it's an important part of the > >> ecosystem. > >> > > >> > On Thu, Sep 29, 2016 at 5:33 AM, Wink Saville <[email protected]> > wrote: > >> > > >> >> What is the criteria for inclusion in 16.09, any possibility we could > >> >> include 16.09? > >> >> > >> >> -- Wink > >> >> > >> >> _______________________________________________ > >> >> nix-dev mailing list > >> >> [email protected] > >> >> http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev > >> >> > >> >> > >> > _______________________________________________ > >> > nix-dev mailing list > >> > [email protected] > >> > http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev > >> >
_______________________________________________ nix-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
