Lukas Epple <[email protected]> writes: > On Sat, Mar 18, 2017 at 11:20:00AM +0000, Jan Malakhovski wrote: > Instead of wasting your time on a NixOS fork, just build an abstraction > over *any* init/daemon management system (so atm systemd, openrc, runit, > sinit, …) and get it into NixOS upstream for great good. Just looking at > the wonderful abstraction NixOS has already given us, I am sure, that it > is indeed possible to incorporate two very different approaches to Linx > distribution architecture into NixOS.
I, too, would like to see that as an abstraction layer over any init system, rather than a fork. This is pretty much achievable (Gentoo supports many intialization systems) and needed (there was a discussion of the bsd port already). > PS: Also, if you indeed want to fork NixOS, it seems kinda inappropiate to > advertise your fork Don't agree with that. It is perfectly OK to advertise the fork in the main nixos channel. Otherwise, how would you receive any feedback or support?
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
_______________________________________________ nix-dev mailing list [email protected] http://lists.science.uu.nl/mailman/listinfo/nix-dev
