Virgin was a Sprint MVNO, now wholly owned by Sprint. So Sprint Coverage == Virgin Coverage..
-- Tim On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 10:39 AM, Mark J. Bailey <[email protected]> wrote: > I had wondered about that myself. While not a Big Four, I had read several > posts that suggested VM had some good value plans. But the coverage, I > suspected, was more like T-Mobile and/or Cricket. I had also read T-Mobile > could voice/data roam on AT&T now, but if coverage in areas like Watertown > is poor to non-existent, perhaps this was "proposed" when the > T-Mobile/AT&T merger deal was still a possibility. > > -----Original Message----- > From: [email protected] [mailto:[email protected]] On > Behalf Of Sabuj Pattanayek > Sent: Friday, October 05, 2012 10:35 AM > To: [email protected] > Subject: Re: [nlug] T-Mobile vs. Sprint (for data) in Mid-TN? > > anyone used virgin mobile's $35/$45/$55 "unlimited data" plans? Looks like > they start throttling after 2.5GB/month . Any ideas about how good their > coverage is? > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "NLUG" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To > unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected] > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/nlug-talk?hl=en > > -- > You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups > "NLUG" group. > To post to this group, send email to [email protected] > To unsubscribe from this group, send email to > [email protected] > For more options, visit this group at > http://groups.google.com/group/nlug-talk?hl=en > -- You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "NLUG" group. To post to this group, send email to [email protected] To unsubscribe from this group, send email to [email protected] For more options, visit this group at http://groups.google.com/group/nlug-talk?hl=en
