Re: Should FreeBSD "port" for nmh use local pipe delivery, not SMTP?

[Jon Peatfield]

> But I haven't had wide enough experience to judge which would be
> better to do by default.  Any comments on whether or not it'd be
> better to have this do "sendmail" or "smtp" by default?

Certainly this is the way we have always used (n)mh.  Few of our machines 
listen on port 25.  It also means you can send mail even if any listener is 
dead.