Dan Winship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > It's not stated whether your ssh daemon is ssh 1.x or ssh 2.x, however.
> > I just started using SSH (after meaning to for a long time), but I
> > gather that the difference is somewhat meaningful.
>
> Almost everyone is still using ssh1. The only currently existing ssh2
> implementation (I think) is the one from ssh.fi,
Actually, there's also the GPL'd "lsh":
http://www.net.lut.ac.uk/psst/
but of course it doesn't seem to be as far along as the ssh.fi version.
It'll probably catch up, though, as an independent implementation is
apparently required for the standardization process.
> which is essentially not free. (You can download the source, but the
> license basically forbids 99.99% of people from using it.)
Ah. I didn't realize it was that restrictive -- I thought they were using
the usual definition of "commercial use" and thought it didn't apply to me.
So has ssh1 been kept up as security holes have been found, or does one need
to use it in conjunction with some 3rd-party patch repository?
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Dan Harkless | To prevent SPAM contamination, please do not post this
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | private email address to the USENET or WWW. Thank you.
