Re: Upped the development source version number to 1.0.3

[Dan Harkless]

Dan Winship <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> How about we [insert some magic here that I haven't had time to think
> about in depth] so that non-release builds get the date (YYYYMMDD)
> appended to the version number. So you know _exactly_ what level of
> bugfixiness they have in their clients.

Sounds good to me if it's doable, assuming the YYYYMMDD you're talking about
is the date of check-in of the newest file amongst those you're compiling
(presumably including non-compiled files like scan.man).

I'm sure it's very rare for someone to run cvs update on just a single file
rather than the whole tree, so having the YYYYYMMDD be meaningless due to
that would seem not be an issue.

-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Dan Harkless                   | To prevent SPAM contamination, please 
[EMAIL PROTECTED]      | do not post this private email address
SpeedGate Communications, Inc. | to the USENET or WWW.  Thank you.