Re: Upped the development source version number to 1.0.3

[Doug Morris]

"Dan Harkless" wrote:
>Ah.  I misunderstood because "1.0.2-dev" implies to me a developer version
>of 1.0.2 -- i.e. something preceeding the release of 1.0.2.  I would much
>prefer "1.0.2+dev".  That implies 1.0.2 plus some development.  Much less
>easy to accidentally drop the suffix than a single '+', too.
>> I'm in MET, 
>Middle Eastern Time?

Middle European -- Switzerland. Also CET or GMT+1 (now that we're back
on standard time).

>Well, like I said earlier, how 'bout combining the two as "+dev"?  I'll go
>ahead and change it to that for now.  If anyone has a better alternative,
>post it to the list.

Sounds reasonable.

-Doug