Sean Kamath <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> As I told Mr. Harkless, if this mail included nmh-workers, then
> version 1.0.2 fixed the problem. Thanks.
Yes, I got both copies.
> On the topic I seemed to have started: Mangling e-mail addresses gets
> to be a huge problem. That's why it's a good idea to use the
> archiving capabilities of the e-mail list handler you're using. Then
> the archive is accessible from subscribers only. I know listserv and
> majordomo have archive mechanism, so I assume almost all have some
> mechanism. If you want to redistribute an archive, then here's how
> I'd do it:
I don't understand this sentence:
> Subscribe my archiving mechanism, and have people subscribe to that.
Can you elaborate?
> It might be possible to figure out if a person
> attempting to subscribe to the archive list are on the real list
> (depends on how open it is), or you could only allow people that have
> posted to the mailing list to access it (i.e. keep a list of who's
> posted to the mailing list - yuk).
>
> In anycase, I appreciate the quick response! I'll go back to lurking
> (what I usually do on lists) until I have something meaningful to
> comment on ;-)
>
> Sean "He who henceforth shall not include his e-mail address in his
> Signature" Kamath
Heh heh.
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Dan Harkless | To prevent SPAM contamination, please
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | do not post this private email address
SpeedGate Communications, Inc. | to the USENET or WWW. Thank you.
