Dan Harkless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

>"Chris Garrigues" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>> So clearly it provides for overriding the name, but not for simply adding
>> an extension.  I think adding this functionality to nmh would be useful.

>> I would then also be able to repackage my spam-proof addresses in a way 
>> that I wouldn't be embarrassed to share with others.

>Okay.  Well, I'll wait to hear from Neil Rickert about how sacred /
>widely-used the $USERPLUS variable is, and whether he would mind having to
>put his own '+' in a $USER_EXTENSION variable.

I should have added this to my previous comment:

I don't see any big problems with changing to $USER_EXTENSION, and
including the '+'.  But I also don't see any big problems with
dropping the whole thing and using the user specified "From:" as in
1.0.3.  Again, John might have a different opinion.

 -NWR

Reply via email to