Digital UNIX still (as of 4.0D) bundles a version of mh. As an OpenBSD developer, I'd really like to *not* see nmh GPL'd. Without getting into a huge religious war I see no compelling reason that nmh needs the 'protections' the GPL provides. A simple licence that says 'you can't claim this work as your own and you can't sue the authors' if my license of choice. In other words, a BSD/MIT style license. - todd
- COPYRIGHT is bogus... Dan Harkless
- Re: COPYRIGHT is bogus... Dan Harkless
- Re: COPYRIGHT is bogus... Todd C. Miller
- Re: COPYRIGHT is bogus... Simon Burge
- Re: COPYRIGHT is bogus... Dan Harkless
- Re: COPYRIGHT is bogus... Dan Harkless
- Re: COPYRIGHT is bogus... Ruud de Rooij
- Re: COPYRIGHT is bogus... John Summerfield
- Re: COPYRIGHT is bogus... John Summerfield
- Re: COPYRIGHT is bogus... Earl Hood
- Re: COPYRIGHT is bogus... John Summerfield
- Re: COPYRIGHT is bogus... Earl Hood
- Re: COPYRIGHT is bogus... Mate Wierdl
