Dan Harkless <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> Simon Burge <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> > > If not the GPL, what other open source license would be most appropriate? X
> > > License? Apache License? BSD License? Artistic License? Others...?
> >
> > BSD is reasonably common, and fairly free with the adversting clause
> > (the old "Clause 3") removed.
>
> Oh yeah, the advertising issue. Is the "Clause 3"-less version a standard
> variant of the BSD license (e.g. does it have a name?), or is that just
> something that a lot of people do when they make their own derivative of it?
Actually, the advertising clause has been officially removed from the
BSD license by UCB.
- Ruud de Rooij.
--
ruud de rooij | [EMAIL PROTECTED] | http://ruud.org
