Well, Yahoo! still hasn't listed nmh. I poked around on their site and
found an email address you can send grievances to. I did.
------- Forwarded Message
To: [EMAIL PROTECTED]
Subject: You never list nmh even though EXMH, just an nmh wrapper, is listed
From: "Dan Harkless" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Date: Fri, 07 Jul 2000 19:45:46 -0700
Hello. I'm one of the developers of nmh, an open-source UNIX email suite.
nmh is the actively-updated descendent of MH, the first sophisticated email
tool, developed by the RAND Corporation and the Unversity of California,
Irvine.
nmh developers, including myself, have submitted nmh to the
Computers_and_Internet/Software/Internet/Email category several times over
the past year or so. The listing has never come through.
This is surprising and frustrating given the fact that much more minor
players in the email software world _are_ listed in the category.
If nmh is being excluded as an editorial decision, then why is EXMH
included? It's merely a GUI wrapper around (and is worthless without) [n]mh.
It would be very much appreciated if you could go ahead and list nmh. My
preferred description would be:
nmh - The successor to RAND/UCI's MH (Message Handler), a suite of
single-purpose UNIX commandline email tools -- extremely customizeable
and programmable.
- --
Dan Harkless
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
SpeedGate Communications, Inc.
------- End of Forwarded Message
No offense to EXMH folks, BTW. Just trying to find some angle to get Yahoo!
to quit being retards. Also, did I manufacture that "the first
sophisticated email tool", or is that the case? ("sophisticated" is
relative, of course...)
-----------------------------------------------------------------------
Dan Harkless | To prevent SPAM contamination, please
[EMAIL PROTECTED] | do not post this private email address
SpeedGate Communications, Inc. | to the USENET or WWW. Thank you.
