> From: Peter S Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Date: Thu, 25 Jul 2002 12:27:21 -0400 > > Chris Garrigues <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > If nmh were to include an mhsh which was tclsh with nmh commands, the > > state could be maintained in the shell instead of having to write > > everything out to temp files. > > So mh-e would open a single process for this shell and pass all commands > through it?
Since I don't use mh-e, I hadn't thought about it, but that sounds logical. Chris -- Chris Garrigues http://www.DeepEddy.Com/~cwg/ virCIO http://www.virCIO.Com 716 Congress, Suite 200 Austin, TX 78701 +1 512 374 0500 World War III: The Wrong-Doers Vs. the Evil-Doers.
msg00976/pgp00000.pgp
Description: PGP signature
