Ken Hornstein <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>>It is the accessibility of command line tools that makes nmh so
>>powerful. It is already in the 21st century, although a little buggy
>>in spots.
>
>Oh, I agree ... but I don't think NEW features that don't remove or diminish
>the command-line tools functions are necessarily bad. E.g., embedding
>Tcl into nmh (or even the reverse) could be done in a sane manner. For
>example, if I could run a Tcl script to generate headers when using
>"repl" as an alternative for "replcomps" (which currently is nowhere
>near powerful enough to do what I really want) would be interesting.
>If you didn't like it, you could simply not compile it in or not use it.
>You wouldn't have an objection to things like that, would you?
>
I wouldn't.
Norman Shapiro
798 Barron Avenue
Palo Alto CA 94306-3109
(650) 565-8215
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
