Chad Walstrom <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > > Has anyone had a look at the gnu-arch revision control system? > > Currently, I'm using it for all of my Debian packages. I'm planning on > migrating my personal GNATS development to it, and synchronizing with > the savannah CVS repository. > > It's a paradigm shift from classic CVS management -- the commands are > not really one-for-one with CVS -- but I think it's worth it.
Do you know how it compares to Subversion or p4? What is its maturity? I've recently started using Subversion at work and like it a lot. It's very much like p4, but better. It's very similar to CVS, except that you can move and copy files and directories with ease and with preservation of history; you can perform a lot of operations directly on the repository with URLs. Because operations are atomic and a single log message applies to a group of files, I've found that the ChangeLog has become obsolete. A "svn log" on the root directory provides the same information. But this is all a bit off-topic since we're sort of limited to what Savannah provides. -- Bill Wohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.newt.com/wohler/ GnuPG ID:610BD9AD Maintainer of comp.mail.mh FAQ and MH-E. Vote Libertarian! If you're passed on the right, you're in the wrong lane. _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
