On Tue, Sep 21, 2004 at 01:54:08PM -0400, Ken Hornstein wrote: > >Has anyone had a look at the gnu-arch revision control > >system? > > > >It's highly distributed nature makes it ideal for the style > >of development that nmh has. > > > >Have a look at http://wiki.gnuarch.org/ > > It seems interesting ... but I guess I don't see any compelling reason > to switch, personally. I mean, I may be a slacker, but my turnaround time > for adding a new developer to savannah is usually pretty good.
I didn't mean to accuse anyone of slacking! :-) Fact is though, no-one gets paid to maintain nmh and dropouts in activity have occurred, and sometimes that out of your control anyway (gnu.org break-in) With arch, everyone can keep hacking/commmiting/branching/ merging with each other and then merge in the 'main' repository at some later time. That's just the difference between centralised and decentralised. > > >Matt > >ps. i sent a another version of this mail but it's being > >held waiting for moderator approval .. sigh. > > Dealing with messages held in the moderator queue is way down on my list > of priorities. Again, sorry for the apparent criticism! It was my problem; zip changed to zipworld and I have to be careful my mail goes out with the correct from. Matt _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [EMAIL PROTECTED] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
