[EMAIL PROTECTED] writes: > (Can't claim any credit for finding this, it's debian bug 320090:
Thanks for helping out Nick in getting the Debian bugs fixed upstream. Has Nick entered the rest of the Debian bugs at Savannah? If not, it sounds like you could help him out in this way (after first checking with Nick, of course!). > Incidentally, should dtimep.c really be in CVS, since it's a generated > file? Good observation about dtimep.c. I used to check in a generated file in MH-E (mh-loaddefs.el) thinking it might be nice for a released package, but it because much more trouble than it was worth since it could always be generated successfully. What is/was the rationale for checking in dtimep.c (if it is generated as you say)? -- Bill Wohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.newt.com/wohler/ GnuPG ID:610BD9AD Maintainer of comp.mail.mh FAQ and MH-E. Vote Libertarian! If you're passed on the right, you're in the wrong lane. _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
