Jon Steinhart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:

> I have thought about this.  There are time where one really wants to
> know THE current folder, which means none if there is none.

But there *is* a current folder if there isn't one in context, and
it's +inbox.

Why don't you use mhparam instead?

    [EMAIL PROTECTED]:878]$ mhparam Current-Folder
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]:879]$ echo $?
    1
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]:880]$ folder +lists
    lists+ has no messages       ;        (others).
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]:881]$ mhparam Current-Folder
    lists
    [EMAIL PROTECTED]:882]$ echo $?
    0

-- 
Bill Wohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>  http://www.newt.com/wohler/  GnuPG ID:610BD9AD
Maintainer of comp.mail.mh FAQ and MH-E. Vote Libertarian!
If you're passed on the right, you're in the wrong lane.



_______________________________________________
Nmh-workers mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers

Reply via email to