Harald Geyer <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: >> So what exactly are the plans for 2.0? > > I think the more important question is: Which of the various plans that > people have, need a major effort before the can be released and which > things can drip in as they get done? For the later i think Jon's > approach of "Do whatever you like to see!" is just the right thing.
That will be the reality too ;-). The thing is to get the ideas out there and get people excited to do them. >> Here are some things I'd like to see, in increasing order of complexity: All excellent. > Would this really be useful? I think to pick one thread but sort it > by Date rather than as tree is much more natural for ML discussions. Some threads spawn sub-threads. You might be interested in some sub-threads but not others. MH-E does threading, so if such a feature were added to nmh, we could (eventually) take out our support. We've also added indexing, which could be added to nmh. I'm trying to think of more MH-E features we've added that could well be in nmh, but I'm drawing a blank. Need coffee. -- Bill Wohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.newt.com/wohler/ GnuPG ID:610BD9AD Maintainer of comp.mail.mh FAQ and MH-E. Vote Libertarian! If you're passed on the right, you're in the wrong lane. _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
