> > How about: > > 441 12/18 Joel Uckelman (0) [Nmh-workers] mhshow: invalid QUO > > 442 12/18 Josh Bressers (1) Re: [Nmh-workers] mhshow: invalid > > 443 12/18 Paul Fox (1) Re: [Nmh-workers] mhshow: invalid > > 444 12/18 Joel Uckelman (2) Re: [Nmh-workers] mhshow: invalid > > 448 12/19 To:nmh-worker (3) Re: [Nmh-workers] mhshow: invalid > > 447 12/19 To:nmh-worker (1) Re: [Nmh-workers] mhshow: invalid
Sorry, what I meant was: 447 12/19 To:nmh-worker (3) Re: [Nmh-workers] mhshow: invalid 448 12/19 To:nmh-worker (1) Re: [Nmh-workers] mhshow: invalid > > This would provide - depending on sorting - the same information as > > above, could be calculated statically/on a per message basis, would be > > easier to represent on a terminal and easier to parse for humans if the > > thread is longer than the screen. > > [...] But I hope that the default format > will not change. As do I. Harald _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
