> I hope John Romine -- who did MH maintenance at UC Irvine for years
> -- won't mind my repeating something he mentioned to me years ago.
> He was thinking about replacing mh-format -- that is, code like:
>
> %4(msg)%<(cur)+%| %>%<{replied}-%?{x-done} %|>%>
>
> with a scripting language like Tcl, or something else more standard.
Is formatting really a job that requires a Turing-complete language? The
possibility of a formatter that doesn't terminate on some input is
NOT appealing.
Anyway, I think we should take advantage of past experience and choose
the substitute language based on how difficult it is to implement
the mh-format language in it. mh-format has evolved based on the
requirements of message formatting, and is probably a good representative.
Attempting a "microcode-like" system for compatibility with mh-format
strikes me as a good litmus test.
Some functional language without the ability to recurse is what I'd
look for.
Cheers,
- Joel
_______________________________________________
Nmh-workers mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
