>> 441 12/18 Joel Uckelman o [Nmh-workers] mhshow: invalid QUO >> 442 12/18 Josh Bressers +o Re: [Nmh-workers] mhshow: invalid >> 443 12/18 Paul Fox +o Re: [Nmh-workers] mhshow: invalid >> 444 12/18 Joel Uckelman |+o Re: [Nmh-workers] mhshow: invalid >> 448 12/19 To:nmh-worker | +o Re: [Nmh-workers] mhshow: invalid >> 447 12/19 To:nmh-worker +o Re: [Nmh-workers] mhshow: invalid >> (better ASCII-art thread tree suggestions welcome) > >trn(1), Usenet reader, used to be very good at showing an understandable >tree fragment in the top-right corner.
You know, I was wondering why I didn't remember the original message ... and that was because it was from 7 years ago! And Usenet? What is this strange thing you speak of? I think I heard my grandfather mention it once. In all seriousness ... I used to use trn a lot, and I remember that tree fragment display rather well. I found it on sourceforge ... woo, a bunch of files are marked as being last modified 11 years ago. Suddenly I feel old. I guess that code is in trn4/rt-wumpus.c. Hm, that's only 638 lines. A quick look shows that it's hairy, but not terrible. Might be worth cribbing from, but I guess that would only make sense in "show", right? Since trn is a monolithic application it was easy to integrate it; I'm not sure how it would work in nmh. --Ken _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
