I haven't been following this discussion very closely (I'm working two jobs these days...), so my comment may be out of order here. I've changed the subject of this message because my comment is sort of tangential to this topic. When I saw this:
On 2 February 2006 at 14:26, Joel Reicher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote "Re: [Nmh-workers] Should attachment header handling be in send?" > > MIMEd messages really shouldn't be edited I had to disagree. One of the reasons I like the sort-of arcane MIME setup in MH/nmh is because I *can* edit the message draft with vi (or whatever). For instance, after I type "mime" to build the draft, I can remove the header fields from a forwarded message that reveal some personal details about my mail-handling setup (such as the annotations that come from "anno", forwarding, etc.). I can delete bloated quotes, remove or rearrange body parts, change the separator string to make multipart/alternative into something else, and so on. Most monolithic mailers hide those details from me. I hope nmh never does. And now back to our regularly scheduled discussion... Jerry _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
