Joel Reicher <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > One more thing. Would anyone object to profile components like > Attach-Header: X-MH-Attach > Forward-Header: X-MH-Forward
I haven't followed the discussion about these fields, but I can speak to the proposed names. Note that RFC 2822 and MH call individual header fields "header fields" or just "fields". The "header" refers to the entire message header or the show header. While we might use header casually when we mean a field (although it would be better to get into better habits), let's keep the user-visible stuff consistent to avoid possible surprise or confusion. -- Bill Wohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.newt.com/wohler/ GnuPG ID:610BD9AD Maintainer of comp.mail.mh FAQ and MH-E. Vote Libertarian! If you're passed on the right, you're in the wrong lane. _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
