Peter Galbraith <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > Jon Steinhart <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> If you decide to make these additions, keep in mind that they have to >> be done in the send code, not in the whatnow code. This is because >> the design of the attachment code was such that it would work >> independent of the user interface. In particular, I know people who >> have hacked mh-e to add attachment headers. > > I'm sure Bill will chime-in here... MH-E now can use either mhn > attachment directives, or gnus directives. The Content-Type is (for the > most part) filled-in automatically using `file -i'.
Don't need to when the other MH-E developers do so for me ;-). Note that MH-E calls mhbuild/mhn to expand the directives before calling send. I haven't been following this discussion close enough to know how that impacts the design. p.s. We've started calling MH-E as such with all uppercase since version 7. -- Bill Wohler <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> http://www.newt.com/wohler/ GnuPG ID:610BD9AD Maintainer of comp.mail.mh FAQ and MH-E. Vote Libertarian! If you're passed on the right, you're in the wrong lane. _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
