> On Tue, Feb 07, 2006 at 07:57:16AM +1100, Joel Reicher wrote:
> > [ .. ]
> > potentially many records (sequences) to update. Without getting too
> > whacky, about the only fast way I can think to do sequences is by having
> > them as a list of inodes.
>
> Everytime I've seen inodes exposed at the user level,
> there are tears eventually. Some filesystems inodes
> aren't stable, sometimes people move (copy+delete) the
> mail etc, etc.
>
> So please not!
My instinctive hesitation is more than happy to defer to your experience. :)
By the way, if anyone happens to think that the 26 sequence limit should
be lifted, speak up. Perhaps the performance hit wouldn't be so bad.
Cheers,
- Joel
_______________________________________________
Nmh-workers mailing list
[email protected]
http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
