> > I think that if you want to keep the threading support out of the main > nmh utilities (scan/show/etc) you need to at least add an option to them > to respect the order of message numbers on the command line. > (But I still think that actually having the core utilities know about > threads would be better, in the same way that it's more convenient for > them to all know about syntaxes like '4-5', 'last:20', etc.)
It may be worth looking at this and expanding on the idea: http://jmason.org/software/mhthread/ I ran across that some time ago and played with it a bit. I like the idea, but it could use some refining. -- JB _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
