On January 28, 2010 at 15:35, Ken Hornstein wrote: > Why does nmh have SASL support? Because I needed, and I wrote the > code. Why does nmh _not_ have TLS support? Because no one has written > the code (in more cynical moments, I might say, "Because I _didn't_ > need it"). Note that anyone is free to _write_ the code, and it's not > clear to me that it's really all that hard ... but it hasn't happened > yet.
I think the difficulty may depending on the TLS library to use. When I looked at years ago wrt openssl, it appeared to me that the work require rewriting I/O stuff in nmh. Of course, I was not an expert at the time, but I did not see a quick fix to the problem. --ewh _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
