Ken Hornstein wrote: >> Also there doesn't seem >>to be anything in ChangeLog about this... > >Sigh. It was getting late, I had to go home ... I wanted to get >that stuff out there. I'll do the ChangeLog later.
I'd care a lot less about ChangeLog if we had a vcs that let us look at a sane changelog for the project :-) >And I don't think it will break the debian packaging, because now >the argument to --with-cyrus-sasl is silently ignored. Oh, OK; that makes sense. >it should still work fine. If it doesn't, let me know I've just tested, and configure fails with: checking sasl.h usability... no checking sasl.h presence... no checking for sasl.h... no configure: error: sasl.h not found because sasl.h is in /usr/include/sasl/sasl.h I think that's just a trivial error in your AC_CHECK_HEADER invocation, though. >>(I'd forgotten how lousy cvs was until I came back to >>nmh; I don't suppose we could get consensus on moving >>to a VCS with actual support for atomic commits and >>other modern conveniences? :-)) > >I kinda feel the same way. My vote is for git, I think git's UI is pretty foul but it has the advantage that it's rapidly becoming the de-facto DVCS standard. I could live with it or bzr. > but the REAL question is: where to put it? You have some reason for wanting to move away from savannah? (they support arch, bzr, git, mercurial and svn.) -- PMM _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
