Ken Hornstein writes: > > Couple of years ago emacs switch to "internal" coding in utf-8. I > > had to stop using emacs and mh-e. > > See, this is what I'm missing - why, exactly? I assume the problem was not > just philsophical.
Neither politycal, nor religious =:-) Purely practical. Imagine replying to an utf-8 message. Appended signature is in iso, so I start with mixture of charsets. Then I have a lot of codings to play with. Conversion of utf-8 part of message. Headers of the message. Three types of internal emacs codings. It was possible to set it all correctlly, but I realize that my life is too short for such a games. How to process ... and have some work done. =:-) I was advised to switch to utf-8, but this would not help too much. Imagine replying to iso message .... And inserting text file from disc. With regret I had to find another editor. Max _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
