On 2012-02-07, at 10:13 AM, Joel Uckelman wrote: > What you're describing here is far beyond what I was intending; I only > want a seamless way to apply my eyeballs to these broken messages.
I don't think it gets any more seamless than cat. I would have show (and anything else) print the full pathname to the message file upon error, and leave it to you how you want to deal with looking at it. Earl has already suggested some alternatives that provide at least minimal header processing, should you want that. But the job of the MH commands is to process *822-compliant messages. As soon as we're out of that realm, their work is done. --lyndon _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
