On 2012-02-07 18:29, Lyndon Nerenberg wrote: > On 2012-02-07, at 7:37 AM, Oliver Kiddle wrote: > > > But do you really think that > > should be the only resort when badly formed mail arrives? I'd prefer to > > see what was intended by the sender. > > Yes, I do :-( QP and Base64 (and MIME in general) have been around for > nearly two decades now. If the sender can't get it right, too bad. And > really, the only time I see that sort of cruft is from spamming software. > > We have the far to usual case of maillists blindly tagging on their footer to base64 messages. Not spam, not an unexpected breaking, just stupid software at the source.
-A _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
