>The problem is where the mention of spost appears in the FAQ. >The complete question and answer are below. spost is in the last >recommendation, #7. For the purpose of answering this question, does #7 >do anything that "mts: sendmail" does not?
When I asked about spost earlier, there was one legitimate use I saw for it. Someone used it to send messages through a custom program that encrypted all of their outgoing email; that would be hard to do with regular post unless they implemented all of "sendmail -bs". It sounded like everyone else that used spost had put it in their .mh_profile a decade ago to fix some long-forgotten problem. I'm with David; mention of it should be removed from the FAQ, and people should be directed to use the sendmail MTA. Optionally we could tell people about the -server option to send when using the SMTP MTA. --Ken _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
