On 2012-03-15, at 6:50 PM, Jon Steinhart wrote: > Are you suggesting having a header like nmh-attachment which is > rfc-problematic > or just that we change the MH to NMH?
x-* is dead. If we're going to abuse the header namespace for things that trigger nmh-specific functionality, let's at least put them in a namespace that we can succinctly document as "these are not real rfc2822 messages headers; instead they trigger internal nmh actions." _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
