>My only thought is that MIME is more than just the linear list of >attachments that many seem to believe, and we need to come up with >a naming convention capable of representing that. And even then, >deciding what to store as content for a given part isn't necessarily >straightforward. For example, if you have a multipart/alternative >part, how do you represent that in the filesystem? We've briefly >touched on some of this before:
I think that it's solvable; seems like the multipart "container" objects wouldn't be represented in the filesystem. > http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/nmh-workers/2012-02/msg00088.html I also note that thread included someone (who shall remain nameless) offering to design a new API to replace m_getfld() :-) --Ken _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
