>maybe call the mts values: smtp, bsmtp (alias sendmail, for backwards compat), >pipe?
I'm fine with merging spost into post. A couple of comments: - I'm not so sure about about what to call it either. It gets kinda confusing now that we have two different ways to call sendmail. I like "pipe" for the spost replacement, but I think having "sendmail" would be confusing. But I don't like "bsmtp" either (I assume that's "batched SMTP"? What's particularly batched about it?). But I don't have any better suggestions. Maybe "sendmail/smtp" and "sendmail/pipe"? With just "sendmail" meaning "sendmail/smtp"? To me that's a little clearer. - It occurs to me that some of these things should be overrideable via mh_profile (like the path to sendmail). Just saying :-) - It should be made clear in the man pages that in the "pipe" or "sendmail/pipe" case that it's impossible to set the envelope-from address. - Are we going to have some notification at runtime for those people who put "spost" in their postproc a couple of decades ago for some long-forgotten reason? :-) As far as I can tell that's pretty much the case for everyone except Alex. I was going to say that we should make sure that we create a test for it, but I know David is the test suite champ :-) --Ken _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
