Ken wrote: > Maybe "sendmail/smtp" and "sendmail/pipe"? With just > "sendmail" meaning "sendmail/smtp"? To me that's a > little clearer.
I like those. I just had some quality airplane time and was able to wrap up the addition of "pipe". It's committed. I got your message after, I'll change the names this week. spost is still there so nothing should be broken. > - It occurs to me that some of these things should be > overrideable via mh_profile (like the path to sendmail). > Just saying :-) And an -mts command line option would help with the migration away from spost, which could then just exec "post -mts sendmail/pipe". > - It should be made clear in the man pages that in the > "pipe" or "sendmail/pipe" case that it's impossible to > set the envelope-from address. Is what's already in the send(1) man page sufficient, starting with "When using SMTP for mail submission?" > - Are we going to have some notification at runtime for > those people who put "spost" in their postproc a couple > of decades ago for some long-forgotten reason? :-) That could go in the neutered spost, just before it execs post. David _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
