jerrad wrote: > > $ scan unseen > > ...notice that third-from-end message is spam... > > $ refile unseen_3 +spam > > Seems delightfully error-prone and inefficient. > Scan includes message numbers, rmm the specific > message and there's no need to count lines of output.
even after over 30 years of typing, i find it much easier to to touch-type long strings of alpha than even shortish strings of digits. my inbox has been into 4 digits for a long time, and mairix gives 6 digit message numbers. believe me, "p last_4" is much less error prone than "p 365530". > > vpick might also be useful here? > http://www.pthbb.org/manual/software/MH/vpick.html no. that's a different tool entirely. paul ---------------------- paul fox, [email protected] (arlington, ma, where it's 37.2 degrees) _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
