>digit message numbers. believe me, "p last_4" is much less error >prone than "p 365530". Sorry, I wasn't clear. The error-proneness wasn't due to typing, but in gauging which line of the displayed sequence was the message you cared about. Although I suppose those who love this mode of specifying messages might develop a scan format file that includes sequence indices in the output...
_______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list Nmh-workers@nongnu.org https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
