On Oct 24, 2013, at 10:13 PM, chad <[email protected]> wrote: > Beyond that, email messages are generally large (compared to calendar > entries, anyway) collections of text. Changes to messages mostly involve > small deltas to metadata. Managing changes to changes to changes based on > revisions and times isn’t trivial, but a lot of the automation (conceptually) > has already been written.
I would really like to see evidence of this claim. My experience of manipulating email messages says otherwise. _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
