On 24 Oct 2013, at 22:18, Lyndon Nerenberg <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Oct 24, 2013, at 10:13 PM, chad <[email protected]> wrote: > >> Beyond that, email messages are generally large (compared to calendar >> entries, anyway) collections of text. Changes to messages mostly involve >> small deltas to metadata. Managing changes to changes to changes based on >> revisions and times isn’t trivial, but a lot of the automation >> (conceptually) has already been written. > > I would really like to see evidence of this claim. My experience of > manipulating email messages says otherwise. I saw it a lot when I still used MH, but that was years back, when 8-10k messages a day wasn't unusual, and I was doing all my own spam filtering. Modern usage patterns might be very different, certainly. Out of curiosity, what common message change that's not metadata do you see? ~Chad _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
