ken wrote: > couldn't find it. I will note that Dcc support is a relatively new > feature compared to group address removal, and is not universally loved > by the greybeards: > > revision 1.2 > date: 1989/05/03 16:25:05; author: sources; state: Exp; lines: +4 -2 > add "Dcc:" header line. This is basically a blind distribution copy. > addresses listed on Dcc: lines are put in the envelope only! > I don't intend to document this since Bcc: is the socially appropriate > header to use for such copies. > /JLR > > That's as far back as the files we have under revision control. And just > for the record, my beard is starting to show a few streaks of grey :-) > > I don't think there's any objection to documenting this behavior, is there? > I know, it's in the MH Book, but we should have a brief mention of this > in the base man pages.
yes, we certainly should. bcc confused me for years, in that it was different than the bcc feature i found in other mailers. when i finally found dcc, it started making sense. paul ---------------------- paul fox, [email protected] (arlington, ma, where it's 36.7 degrees) _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
