Ken wrote: > For those of you that don't spend too much time looking at RFC 822/2822/5322,
Also RFC 6854. It just allows group support in some header fields that 5322 doesn't. I bring it up because it was proposed in March 2013, so apparently there's still interest in developing group support. (I don't bring it up because I think it's a good idea.) > email headers have what is known as "group" support. Specifically, you > can do something like this: > > To: groupname: a, b, c; nmh handles this the same way, if there's no need for the trailing semicolon: To: groupname: a, b, c After seeing your later messages, maybe that's a surprise. I don't know if there's a way for nmh to put a non-blind group in a message. I vote for just updating the documentation. Because the trailing semicolon isn't required, maybe we shouldn't call it group support, just blind list? And maybe that would avoid Ralph's objection? Also, this might be related to the way I fixed part of this bug: http://savannah.nongnu.org/bugs/index.php?15604 which reported that the last member of a blind list in an MH alias file wasn't expanded. The fix was to remove the trailing semicolon from the documentation. Now I can guess where it came from. I don't see a need to revisit that because this is for the alias file, not in the draft. So there's not an issue with non-related addresses following the alias on a line. David _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
