>I'm not saying that we have to follow that concept. But the thing that sticks >out at me is that every new "module" in this implementation requires a source >code change. That's what seems wrong. If some kind of new content shows up >that we want to process and incorporate in a reply message, it shouldn't >require changes to repl.
A clarification: I was speaking here about the proposed "calendar" changes. My proposal for "modules" had some that were fixed and internal, some that could be configured on the fly. --Ken _______________________________________________ Nmh-workers mailing list [email protected] https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/nmh-workers
